Featured Product
PM Prioritization Framework — RICE, WSJF & Custom Scoring
Stop debating priorities in circles. Score, rank, and decide with a system that gets your entire team aligned using proven prioritization models.
Everything you need to prioritize like a data-driven PM
A comprehensive Excel workbook combining three proven scoring models — RICE scoring, WSJF (Weighted Shortest Job First), and custom weighted criteria — with stakeholder tracking and decision logging. Pre-filled with realistic sample data so you can start in under 5 minutes.
- RICE scoring matrix with auto-calculated Reach × Impact × Confidence ÷ Effort
- WSJF scoring with Business Value, Time Criticality, and Risk Reduction
- Custom weighted criteria — define your own scoring dimensions
- Priority Dashboard with side-by-side rankings and comparison chart
- Stakeholder input tracker with alignment view
- Decision log for team accountability
- 2-page methodology guide (PDF) covering scoring models and common pitfalls
- Pre-filled sample data you replace with your own initiatives
Get the Framework
What's Inside the Prioritization Template
Six purpose-built tabs that take you from scattered product backlog to clear, defensible priorities.
Priority Dashboard
At-a-glance view of all initiatives ranked across RICE, WSJF, and custom scoring models, with status tracking and a comparison chart.
RICE Scoring Matrix
Auto-calculated RICE scores using the formula (Reach × Impact × Confidence) ÷ Effort. Enter your numbers, get instant priority rankings.
WSJF Scoring Matrix
Weighted Shortest Job First scoring with Cost of Delay (Business Value + Time Criticality + Risk Reduction) divided by Job Size.
Custom Weighted Criteria
Define your own criteria and weights. Score each initiative against what actually matters to your organization — strategic alignment, revenue impact, technical debt reduction, or anything else.
Stakeholder Input Tracker
Capture every stakeholder's priorities, rationale, and alignment level before your prioritization meeting. Eliminate the HiPPO effect.
Decision Log
Record what was decided, by whom, and why. Build institutional memory your team can reference anytime — no more "why did we build that?"
RICE vs WSJF vs Custom Scoring — Which Framework Should You Use?
Each scoring model solves a different prioritization problem. This template includes all three so you can compare results side-by-side.
| Framework | Formula | Best For | Origin |
|---|---|---|---|
| RICE Scoring | Reach × Impact × Confidence ÷ Effort | Feature-level prioritization where user impact matters most | Intercom (Sean McBride) |
| WSJF | Cost of Delay ÷ Job Size | Program-level sequencing where time criticality and economic value drive decisions | SAFe / Don Reinertsen |
| Custom Weighted | Sum of (Score × Weight) per criterion | Organizations with unique factors not captured by standard frameworks | Configurable |
Built for Product Managers Who Ship
Product Managers
Replace gut-feel prioritization with data. Bring a structured RICE scoring template to your next roadmap review and let the numbers make the case.
Business Analysts
Give your product team a prioritization framework they can actually use. Make backlog grooming and requirements conversations productive.
Product Leaders & VPs
Align your team on what matters. Create transparency and accountability around priority decisions with a system that scales across squads.
Frequently Asked Questions
Common questions about product prioritization frameworks, RICE scoring, and this template.
What is the RICE scoring framework?
RICE is a product prioritization framework that scores initiatives across four factors: Reach (how many users are affected per quarter), Impact (how much each user is affected, scored 0.25 to 3), Confidence (how certain you are of your estimates, as a percentage), and Effort (person-months required). The formula is RICE Score = (Reach × Impact × Confidence) ÷ Effort. It was developed by Sean McBride at Intercom to help product teams objectively rank features and initiatives instead of relying on opinion.
What is the difference between RICE and WSJF prioritization?
RICE (Reach, Impact, Confidence, Effort) measures how many users a feature affects and its individual impact, making it ideal for product teams evaluating feature-level decisions. WSJF (Weighted Shortest Job First) from the SAFe framework calculates Cost of Delay (Business Value + Time Criticality + Risk Reduction) divided by Job Size, making it better for program-level prioritization where time sensitivity matters. RICE focuses on user impact, while WSJF focuses on the economic value of sequencing. Many product teams use both together for a more complete picture — which is exactly what this template enables.
How do I use a RICE scoring template in Excel?
To use this RICE scoring template: (1) Open the workbook and go to the Scoring Matrix tab, (2) Replace the sample initiatives with your own features or projects, (3) Score each initiative on Reach, Impact (0.25-3), Confidence (50-100%), and Effort, (4) The template auto-calculates RICE scores and ranks everything for you, (5) Check the Priority Dashboard for a visual comparison across all three scoring models. The sample data shows you exactly how the system works — just overwrite it with your real data.
What is a product prioritization framework?
A product prioritization framework is a structured methodology that helps product teams objectively decide which features, initiatives, or projects to build next. Instead of relying on the HiPPO (Highest Paid Person's Opinion) or gut instinct, frameworks use consistent scoring criteria to rank work items. Common frameworks include RICE, WSJF, MoSCoW, ICE, the Kano Model, and custom weighted scoring. The best approach often combines multiple frameworks for a complete view — which is the philosophy behind this template.
Does this template work in Google Sheets?
Yes. The template is delivered as an .xlsx file that works natively in Microsoft Excel and can be imported directly into Google Sheets. All formulas, conditional formatting, and charts are compatible. Simply upload the file to Google Drive and open it with Google Sheets to start using it.
Is Excel or Notion better for product prioritization?
Excel is generally better for quantitative prioritization because it supports complex formulas (RICE and WSJF calculations), conditional formatting for visual scoring, and chart generation for stakeholder presentations. Notion is better for collaborative documentation and lightweight tracking but lacks native formula depth for multi-variable scoring models. Many product managers use Excel for scoring and analysis, then share results in Notion or Confluence for team visibility.
Get the Free PM Starter Kit
A lightweight prioritization template + our best product management frameworks, delivered to your inbox.